| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| Transparency: an open letter to Barack ObamaSun, 30 Nov 2008 07:31:16 -0800 by AnnieSweetieOakleyTRANSPARENCY: an open letter to Barack Hussein ObamaPLEASE VISIT LINKS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS DESCRIPTION.This one explains some of the ramifications we will experience if BHO continues to "ignore" the demands for verification:http:// www.thebulletin.us/s ite/news.cfm?newsid= 20210273Barack Obama ran a campaign promising TRANSPARENCY. Yet his own records, the most basic records necessary to determine his eligibilty for the highest office in the land, the Presidency, are vaulted away under lock and key, inaccessible to both the public and public authorities. 17 lawsuits have been filed to date; 3 have been addressed to the Supreme Court.Barack Obama could end these doubts in minutes. According to Edwin Vieira, a constitutional lawyer who has practiced for 30 years and holds four degrees from Harvard:"If he were my client and this question came up in civil litigation, if there was some reason that his birth status was relevant and the other side wanted him to produce the thing and he said 'no,' I would tell him, 'you have about 15 minutes to produce it or sign the papers necessary to produce the document, or I'm resigning as your attorney," said Mr. Vieira. "I don't think any ethical attorney would go ahead on the basis that his client could produce an objective document in civil litigation [and refused to do so]."Further, Mr. Vieira cited a fraud ruling in a 1977 case called U.S. v. Prudden, which he feels applies in this case."Silence can only be equated with fraud when there is a legal and moral duty to speak or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading," the ruling reads. One has to wonder: Why has Barack Obama hired lawyers to squelch our inquiries rather than simply unseal his records and provide us with evidence of his eligiblity to serve as a US President?And what have our Secretaries of States done to verify Barack Obama's elegibility? Every SOS from every state has sworn to uphold the constitution and put forth for election only the names of eligible candidates. Have they done that?The consequences are dire, should Barack Obama prove ineligible:Should Mr. Obama be discovered, after he takes office, to be ineligible for the Office of President of the United States of America and, thereby, his election declared void, Petitioners, as well as other Americans, will suffer irreparable harm in that an usurper will be sitting as the President of the United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal.This issue will not go away even if Mr. Obama is sworn into office.In order to KEEP OUR COUNTRY SECURE FROM ITS ENEMIES, We the People insist that Barack Obama UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS THAT PROTECT OUR NATION.Note: Obama is not yet the president elect. He cannot hold that title until after the Electoral College convenes on December 15th and the Electors vote has been conducted. The results are then presented to a joint session of Congress on January 6, 2009. Objections may be presented and heard. Then Congress certifies the votes. Only then would Obama be the "president elect".Since Obama resigned his seat in the US Senate, he is, at this time, an unemployed private citizen, with no power and no authority.We want to know the truth.We are ashamed of, but will not be stopped, by a media blackout.Sign the petition:http://www. wnd.com/index.php?fa =PAGE.view&pageId=81 550Get informed:http://www. tulsatoday.com/index .php?option=com_cont ent&task=view&id=179 9&Itemid=2http://the naturalborncitizen.b logspot.com/http://a tlasshrugs2000.typep ad.com/atlas_shrugs/ obamas_birth_certifc ate_forgery/http://a mericamustknow.com/d efault.aspxhttp://ww w.obamacrimes.com/ht tp://hillbuzz.wordpr ess.com/2008/11/29/w hy-wont-obama-just-p roduce-his-vault-cop y-birth-certificate- and-settle-this-once -and-for-all/http:// www.freedommarch.org /FreedomMarch_Radio. html#Orly_Taitz_Part _1http://peoplespass ions.org/documents/c all_to_action.html(e dited) Song: Remember the Promise by Cock RobinPlease view in high quality if you can!Disclaimer: This video was not commissioned or paid for by any organization, party or pac. It is the result of one person's voluntary efforts. Related: barack hussein obama barry soetoro natural born citizen president elect eligibility birth certificate dnc fraud alan keyes orly taitz leo donofrio constitution puma party unity my ass national security constitutional law howard dean nancy pelosi donna brazile harry reid treason | |
|
|
| Hillary Clinton - Secretary of State? Christopher Hitchens debates Paul BegalaWed, 26 Nov 2008 12:30:13 -0800 by AntiConformist911The biggest shock, of course, is the tapping of Hillary Clinton for secretary of state. I say shock because no one expected it, including Her Imperial Highness of Appalachia. But the more you think about it, the less surprising it is. Clinton remains the biggest domestic threat to the Obama presidency. The Republicans, decimated by the feckless campaign of John McCain and the malign incompetence of Karl Rove, have become a toothless, bitter rump. The Clintons, however, retain a following in the Democratic party and the Senate, and Hillary, left to machinate on Capitol Hill, would be angling to put her stamp on healthcare reform and run against Obama in 2012. At every stage, he would have to watch his back. And front.Earlier this year, it seemed a good idea to plonk her on the ticket to defang the threat. That would have followed the team of rivals concept that Obama wanted to purloin from Lincoln. It would also have given the Clintons an independent claim on power. By winning without them and even, in some measure, despite them, Obama can now bring the Clintons into the power structure while retaining clear dominance. The State Department appointment is prestigious enough not to be condescending, yet also keeps Clinton off the Washington circuit more than any other position. Iraq. Think of the appointment this way: You voted for this bloody war, Hillary; you can end it. Withdrawing from Iraq will not be easy and it may well be gruesome. I have no confidence that the place wont erupt into an even nastier civil war when the United States pulls out than it did when the United States didnt fully push in. How does a president avoid the domestic blow-back of essentially cutting his losses on a doomed adventure? He uses Clinton as a protective shield from domestic critics.Its also a rather brilliant manoeuvre against those elements on the right from Fox News to Washington neocons who came out in praise of Clinton in the spring when she sounded more hawkish than Obama on the Middle East. Having hailed Clinton as the Iron Lady of the Jews, the stab-in-the-back right will find it hard to pivot immediately and accuse her of treason if and when she ends the Iraq occupation.Clintons relative hawkishness on Iran will also help Obama. When he opens negotiations, he will have a tough intermediary who will keep Tehran guessing and enable him to retain a certain aloofness. Shed be the bad cop; hed remain the good one. I doubt anyone in foreign capitals would question that the Clintons were doing as Obama asked them. To undermine your own president at the education department is one thing; to plot against him in front of foreigners is treason. The State Department is therefore a golden strait-jacket. Also, any Clinton triumphs can only redound to Obamas credit. Win-win. If she succeeds in the office, its hard to think of a better platform for the presidency in 2016.The real import of the decision, though, may not be understood until the Obama administration tackles the Israel-Palestine question. The Clintons are well known and respected on both sides. They have prestige to cash in and a Rolodex to use in trying to move a potential deal forward. Bills 2000 blueprint for a two-state deal is still the best working proposal. If any combination could achieve a breakthrough, it would be the force magnifier of the new and charismatic president allied with the skill and experience of a former ones wife. And, of course, we all long to see Clinton in a veil.Obamas other chief enemy will be the Democratic Congress. So Obama has picked Rahm Emanuel as his chief of staff to keep the Speaker, Nancy Pelosi, in line; and he has selected Tom Daschle, a key ally who knows Congress well, as his secretary of health and human services. By keeping Bob Gates at defence for the interim, he maintains a bipartisan flavour that, one suspects, will become more obvious as lesser appointments emerge.Eric Holder at justice is a professional pick who will shore up a demoralised department. Janet Napolitano, governor of a border state, will head homeland security and become a strong female leader in the party to keep Clinton on her toes...Obama has been attuned to domestic politics so far but above all he seems deadly serious about governing. The common thread is managerial competence and intellectual heft and governing experience...unlike George Bush, he has the quality of personnel he needs: people who know how to pull the levers and check under the machinery of government if they dont seem to work. He is change enough. What he needs is a way to make the government work effectively again. After eight years of arbitrary improvisation run out of the vice-presidents imperial office.http://www.ti mesonline.co.uk/tol/ comment/columnists/a ndrew_sullivan/artic le5212446.ece Related: obama president barack cabinet debate christopher chris hitchens bill hillary clinton secretary state defense israel iraq war iran paul begala | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
| |
